Wordfeud League of Honour

It has been the case, until a recent apparent shift in policy, that players were allowed the benefit of 150-0 autos unless there was a concern that they had deliberately avoided finishing/starting a game in order to achieve/avoid promotion/relegation. I think that deliberate intent is most unlikely when all players bar 1 fail to start/complete a game with player X. I have seen some very strange outcomes recently and so... I am going to, not only shot my completed games but also invites I send; I think it has come to a sorry pass when that needs to happen but I don´t see an alternative. You can all laugh as much as you want:) I cannot abide injustice and I see absolutely no reason why a player should be penalised for an opponent not responding. An auto 150-0 should be valued as much as a pre-entered one unless there is suspicion of intent.

@Ironman I very much appreciate that you have flagged up the lack of response from markpercival and that it is reinforced by owly´s plus no other player in the group being able to complete with mark thus far. I would have no question that if the situation were to remain he same you would have entitlement to an auto 150-0 and the consequent benefit of that however... in view of outcomes in similar circumstances of late I strongly suggest that you shot an invite successfully sent/not able to send to the judge along with game list.

As I said, unless the current approach to autos changes I will be screenshotting all invites and be more militant in pursuing opponents - I particularly dislike the latter action as I have always been careful not to hound players.

MORAIRAPAM is one of those rare candles in the dark who donates and keeps this web site running.

The winner gets promoted, the two last players will be relegated. I feel pretty confident that Shade Lord wins the season.